Group Discussion for SSB Interview
For the candidates who want to join the military as officers, group discussion is crucial. Discussion in the group will focus on you and your unique qualities. so that you can successfully lead the group discussion.
You should be fluent in the language and knowledgeable about the subject you will be discussing. You must provide strong arguments in the form of pertinent statistics and facts. Your argument needs to be compelling in order to persuade others to agree with you and be drawn to you. Being the first to speak has benefits. If you initiate the conversation and speak first, you will be seen as the group’s leader, providing your words have some weight. Additionally, you will have sufficient material to speak. If you speak out on the topic, you will be given the opportunity to do so again as the conversation progresses.
Keep in mind that the first assignment in the GTO test series is the group discussion. if you make the GTO feel good about your performance. He will pay closer attention to you in his follow-up exams so he can compare your qualities to those you showed during the group discussion. If he sees attributes in you that are similar to officers, your chances of selection will increase.
The procedure of Group Discussion at SSB
Two rounds of group talks are held. In the first, two subjects are provided, and the candidates are requested to discuss, reach a decision, and inform the GTO of the issue they wish to discuss. Keep in mind that GTO keeps an eye on your ability to persuade the group to explore a particular topic. He will also look to see if the majority of the applicants agreed to discuss the issue from your point of view. As soon as the topic is decided, you must advise the GTO of the group’s choice.
The group-determined topic will be open for discussion by the GTO. The candidate is advised to make the discussion his or her all by utilizing their knowledge and other leadership attributes. When the first round of discussion is finished, GTO will present a new topic for the second round. However, the GTO will select one topic for the second round of discussion. It will be a discussion that will start spontaneously. The candidates should prepare their points of view as soon as the topic is announced and speak swiftly.
In this article, we will have some sample group discussions from which you can get some idea about the group discussion task of the GTO Test Series.
Most Popular Group Discussion Topics in SSB Interview
SAMPLE GD – 1
Police or citizens: whose responsibility is it to uphold law and order?
| Police are Responsible | Citizens are Responsible |
|---|---|
| Friends and the police must play a greater role in upholding the rule of law in the nation. | Gentlemen, in my opinion, it is the responsibility of the countrymen to uphold the law and order. |
| All States and Union Territories have police that is hired and trained to uphold the law. | Police are responsible for investigating the public’s errors. It is unlikely that there will be issues with law and order if the general public is law-abiding and disciplined. The people are the ones who can assist the police in upholding law and order. |
| Everything will go nicely if the police do their duty. The division of their responsibilities must be planned out. They must be watchful and efficient in carrying out their responsibilities. To maintain the upkeep of law and order, they must be held accountable, and their work must be evaluated. They are relied upon by the government and the populace of the nation to maintain security, law, and order. The operations of individuals who rely on police will be hampered by any type of neglect in the performance of their tasks. | In society, the police have a poor reputation. In many deteriorating situations of law and order that harmed the populace, the police typically exhibit laxity in carrying out their duty. The police must improve their reputation by carrying out their tasks successfully. In order for their subordinates to follow their lead and carry out their tasks responsibly, the police hierarchy must set the standard for an effective role. |
| All States and Union Territories have police that is hired and trained to uphold the law. | Why should the police be allowed to bring out our errors? Why do we need to rely on the police? Police are unable to inspect everything. They are unable to fully verify security and safety. We are responsible for handling everything. You are aware that our cops are failing to carry out their duties correctly. This is the widespread criticism of the police throughout the nation. Everyone agrees that the police department has some real issues. They mostly include a lack of personnel, modernized weapons, and equipment. |
| Police-public relations in India are unsatisfactory, according to the Second Administrative Reforms Committee of 2005, since citizens see the police as dishonest, ineffective, and unresponsive, and frequently hesitate to call them. | Understaffing causes police officers to be overworked, which not only affects their effectiveness and effectiveness (resulting in substandard investigations), but also causes psychological suffering and prolongs cases pending. |
| The police are subject to a great deal of political meddling. It prevents them from carrying out their jobs freely, independently, and fairly. Numerous criminal proceedings have been observed to take place in the political backdrop. The police hopelessly observe the same. It is essential to lessen political meddling. It must be possible for the police to operate autonomously. It is intended to make police work entirely professional. | In January 2016, there were roughly 5.5 lakh vacancies in state police forces or 24% of all positions. Therefore, in 2016, the authorized police strength was 137 police, compared to the actual strength of 181 police per lakh people. Keep in mind that the UN suggested 222 police officers per lakh people. |
| We see numerous instances of robberies, dacoities, murders, rapes, kidnappings, assaults, and altercations every day in society. The cops either don’t know about the criminals’ plans or helplessly observe the events. The intelligence network, rigorous training, and providing the police with modernized tools and equipment are the more crucial factors in making the police elective. | Why is there a daily increase in the frequency of terrorist acts? They are aware that the police are not checking them. People rely on the cops. The terrorists gain from the circumstance. The people are the ones who can build a public defense, combat terrorists, and play a crucial role in providing information to the police and other relevant organizations regarding dubious instances. |
| Numerous complaints have been made by citizens against the police for their failure to file the FIR. In general, the police harass the public and delay cases. Such issues need to be resolved. The police must cultivate a culture that fosters a helping attitude and a commitment to serving the people. | There are many common incidents that occur frequently, such as rape, suicide, homicide, dowry victimization, and so forth. Every citizen should be motivated to combat such wrongs and crimes. Such atrocities can be decreased if we carry out our responsibilities with a sense of responsibility. For instance, the offenders will be penalized both morally and legally if the victim of rape is encouraged to file a police report to combat the crime, witnesses are ethically encouraged to make frank testimonies, and an atmosphere is formed to shun the rapists from society. That will help society by lowering such crimes. If we don’t, we’re to blame for the recurrence of these incidents in society. |
| Considering these factors, I believe that the police are more accountable for upholding law and order. | Considering everything, I believe that people have a greater obligation to uphold the law and order of society. |
SAMPLE GD – 2
Is a strong opposition necessary for a better parliamentary democracy?
| Strong Opposition is Needed | Strong Opposition is not Necessary |
|---|---|
| Gentlemen, the following factors, in my opinion, make powerful opposition in parliament necessary: | Gentlemen, I don’t think there is any need for a powerful opposition in the legislature. They generally make it harder for parliament to function. |
| A powerful opposition is just as crucial as the ruling party. After extensive discussions and disagreements between members of the ruling party and the opposition party, all significant decisions are made. | The opposition’s function in the legislature has been demonstrated numerous times. They don’t work together with the government. In fact, they go out of their way to make the members of the ruling party look bad over various insignificant topics. They mainly sought to expose fresh problems every day, criticize the government, harm the party’s reputation, and deceive the public regarding government policies and decisions. They are only acting in this way to advance their own political careers. |
| The government’s errors and flaws are brought up by the opposition. Additionally, they call for rectification wherever necessary. | In India, the opposition has a negative reputation. They favor putting up barriers rather than helping the ruling party function smoothly and productively. |
| There won’t be a single ruling party monopoly if the opposition is robust. | If the opposition has a larger membership, the power of the ruling party will be slightly higher. That will result in a small, ineffective government. Governments that have a larger population or a majority can always make choices on crucial topics. Thus, rather than supporting a strong opposition, we ought to support a strong government. |
| India is a democratic nation. The opposition has the right to move a “no confidence motion” and overthrow the government if the ruling party is not performing adequately. The opposition’s actions constantly make the ruling party watchful and cautious. | What advantage is opposition whose sole purpose is to cause a disturbance as opposed to acting in a reasonable manner? The state assemblies have reported the same issue. That demonstrates that a robust opposition has no advantages in either the assemblies or the parliament. |
| The powerful opposition requests that they be consulted by the ruling party before making key decisions. This is advantageous. It is preferable to reach a decision on the issue through consensus and with broad support. | Observing the behavior of opposition members in parliament, it is clear that they only function as a unit when acting against the ruling party. In doing so, they make every effort to disappoint the dominant party. But they are typically found to be apathetic when used for constructive goals. Such resistance serves no purpose other than to trouble the parliament. |
| A powerful opposition can make significant contributions by being effective, helping the governing party make choices quickly, and ensuring that the legislative process runs smoothly. | According to the current situation, there isn’t just one party in India’s opposition. Such opposition is typically disorganized. They represent different types of individuals and have different ideologies, agendas, goals, and demands. Such a group of people can never agree. What good would more people in such an opposition do? In order for the ruling party to demonstrate its effectiveness, it is preferable to have more people in the party than in the opposition. |
| Considering all of these points, I believe there has to be a strong opposition in Parliament. | It has been observed in the past that, regardless of its strength in parliament, our opposition has never assisted the ruling party in efficiently completing the business of parliament. |
| Considering all of these points, I believe there has to be strong opposition in parliament. | Considering all of these factors, I don’t think that powerful opposition is necessary for the legislature. |
Other topics for Group Discussion Practice
- Who has a greater impact on a child: Friends, Parents, or Teachers?
- Should sex education be taught in schools and colleges?
- In which field should the government invest more – Education, Defence, or Healthcare?
- Should computer education be a compulsory part of our education system?
- In which sector India should invest more – The defense sector or the Infrastructure sector?
- After strong steps taken by Italy against the English language, Should India keep English as its official language?
- Will AI replace humans in the workplace in the future?
- SOCIAL MEDIA – whether it is a boon or bane?
- Should Indian Industries invest more in the research of Electrical vehicles or Conventional Vehicles?
- Hybrid work culture – Who is benefitting the most – Employees, Employers, or No one?
- Can Online Learning replace the traditional classroom learning environment?
- Who is more strategically important for India – the USA or Russia?
You can check our earlier article on group discussion.
- GD Topics for SSB Interview | 75+ Latest Group Discussion Topics for SSB Interview 2021
- Tips To Crack Group Discussion at SSB Interview in 2021
Hope this article will help you in understanding the group discussion task that is conducted under the GTO test series. In case you need more topics of Group Discussion for practice, feel free to mail them to [email protected].
All the best for your SSB.
Jai Hind.